संपादकीय नीति
The rules the content on this site is written and checked against, published so you can hold us to them.
Most of what goes wrong with festival information online is not malice — it is copying. A wrong date gets published once, then repeated by every site that treats the first result as a source. The rules below exist to make that harder to do here, and to make it obvious when we are unsure.
A festival date is published only when it can be traced to a real published source, and a date labelled confirmed is one that has been cross-checked against at least two independent sources. Sources we treat as authoritative include state government holiday notifications, published panchangs, temple and religious organisation announcements, and established news reporting for observances without a formal calendar.
We do not treat other festival or listicle websites as sources for a date. Where a date cannot be verified to that standard, it is labelled expected or tentative and the page says why.
Every date on the site carries one of three labels, and the label is the point:
A date is never upgraded to confirmed to make a page look better. Where we simply do not know, the site says we do not know — an unverified date is shown as unverified rather than omitted, because a labelled approximation is more useful to a reader planning a trip than a blank space.
This is the rule everything else depends on. We do not invent, and we do not publish a plausible-sounding guess as a fact. In practice that means:
There is rarely one correct way to observe an Indian festival. Where practice differs meaningfully — between states, between communities, between sampradayas — the page states the variation instead of choosing a single version and presenting it as the definitive one. A festival page that describes only one regional practice as “how it is celebrated” is wrong for most of the people reading it.
Being specific about this matters, because “AI-generated” is now used as both a boast and an accusation. Our position:
The practical test is this: if a page contains a claim that would embarrass the site if it were wrong, that claim should be traceable to a source a reader could check.
Corrections are expected, not exceptional. When a verified factual error is reported or found, the page is corrected and its last-updated date changes. Where a point is genuinely contested rather than simply wrong, the page is changed to describe the disagreement rather than to pick a side.
To report an error, use the contact page and include the page URL, what it says, what it should say, and a source we can check. That last part is what makes a correction fast rather than a debate.
Advertising and editorial content are kept strictly apart, and the separation is structural rather than a promise:
The detail is public in the sponsored content policy and the affiliate disclosure.
Editorial content is written for this site. Where an external source informs a factual claim, the page names it in plain language so a reader can go and check. Quoting a short passage with a link is welcome; republishing the content wholesale is not. See the copyright page.